|
An Economical Alternative for Rapidly Filling Microplates
with V&P Scientific 96 and 384 Dispensing Manifolds
White
Paper by Duong Chau V&P Scientific Staff Scientist
Abstract
V&P
Scientific VP 177AD-1 and
VP 179BJD are dispensing manifolds
designed for rapid filling of 96 and 394 well microplates
respectively. This experiment was set up to determine both
the accuracy and precision of these instruments by measuring
the quantity of aqueous FITC dispensed per well and
calculating the coefficient of variation among the wells and
also the variation among the dispenses.
The
manifolds were tested in volumes of 50, 100, and 200 uL per
well for the VP 177AD-1 and 25, 50, and 75 uL per well for
the VP 179BJD. The coefficient of variations ranged between
3% and 7% using the VP 177AD-1 and between 4% and 5% using
the VP 179BJD when dispensing occurred below the meniscus in
contact with the liquid. Non-contact dispensing was
examined using the VP 179BJD and resulted in coefficient of
variations ranging between 6% and 9%.
The VP
177AD-1 and VP 179BJD manifolds are capable of rapid
dispensing into microplates. These instruments can
instantly fill a microplate with one dispense, while
maintaining acceptable precision. Standard pipettors often
require multiple dispenses to fill a microplate, twelve
dispenses for a 96 well microplate and thirty-two dispenses
for a 384 well microplate using a 12-channel pipettor. This
makes the VP 177AD-1 and VP 179BJD a convenient alternative
to regular pipetting, or an economical replacement for
expensive workstations.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Shown here is the VP 177AD-1 96 format dispensing
manifold with a VP 195K bottle top dispenser. |
|
Photo of VP 179BJD 384 format dispensing manifold mounted on the VP 179A
microplate indexer. |
Introduction
Many
high-throughput laboratories use microplates for their
assays that often require some type of media or reagent
buffer solution in addition to the compound being tested.
Filling up a 96 or 384 well microplate requires the
assistance of a liquid handling robotic station or a lab
technician using a 12-channel pipettor. A robotic
workstation is very expensive, oftentimes outside the budget
of a small lab, while manually pipetting of a microplate is
very time consuming. Even in larger labs, it is more
efficient to have the workstation run assays rather than
fill plates.
V&P
Scientific, Inc. has developed a series of manifolds which
can dispense liquids in 96 and 384 well microplates. This
report will focus on the VP 177AD-1 and VP 179BJD, a 96 well
microplate and a 384 well microplate dispenser,
respectively. With an experienced technician, microplates
can be filled within 20 seconds while being easier to setup
than a robot. These manifolds are designed for
high-throughput labs with an economical budget in mind.
The VP
177AD-1 is a dispensing manifold designed for rapid filling
of 96 well plates. The manifold has 96 stainless steel pins
protruding into the reagent chamber spaced 9 mm apart for a
standard 96 well microplate. Plates can be filled with
reagents by sliding plates under the manifold into the
microplate indexer, adjusting the Z-Height, and using a
liquid dispenser, such as a bottle top dispenser or syringe,
to pump liquid through the manifold and into the microplate.
The VP
179BJD applies the same conceptual design as the VP 177AD-1,
but with 384 stainless steel tubes spaced 4.5 mm apart for
384 format microplates. Also, the VP 179BJD is mounted onto
a VP 179A, allowing for precise indexing of a microplate, a
necessary feature for 384 format microplates.
This
experiment was set up to determine both the accuracy and
precision of these instruments by measuring the quantity of
aqueous FITC dispensed per well and calculating the
coefficient of variation among the wells and also the
variation among the dispenses.
Background
Information
The method
of testing the VP 177AD-1 and VP 179BJD are
fluorescence-based readings, using fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC). FITC is a derivative of fluorescein
with the molecule functionalized with isothiocyanate, thus
making it reactive towards amine and sulfhydrl groups, and a
great tool for labeling proteins. FITC has an excitation
and emission wavelengths of approximately 495 nm/521 nm, and
a maximum energy output at pH. 8.0. Because FITC is pH
sensitive, it is important to keep it in a buffer to avoid
even small shifts in pH1.
The
excitation value output of FITC is directly proportional to
the amount of FITC molecules, hence a linear relationship
between the amount of FITC and the excitation signal. Using
this model, the experiment is designed such that the amount
of FITC dispensed by the manifolds in each well is read,
thus each well can be compared to one another. The percent
coefficient of variation (%CV) can be extrapolated from this
data using the formula:

The percent
coefficient of variation is a recognized value in the
laboratory for determining precision of instruments, thus
allowing for comparisons to other equipments with similar
functionalities (i.e. comparing the manifolds to
multi-channel pipettors commonly found in laboratories)2.
Materials
and Methods
-
96
Dispensing Manifold (V&P Scientific VP 177AD-1)
-
384
Dispending Manifold and Mounting Jig (V&P Scientific VP
179BJD and VP 179A)
-
Bottle Top Dispenser (V&P Scientific VP 195D-1)
-
96-well Polystyrene Black Assay Plate (Greiner Bio-One.
655076)
-
384-well Polystyrene Black Assay Plate (Greiner Bio-One
781076)
-
Microplate Reader (Victor 3)
-
Fluorescein 5-isothiocyanate, Isomer I (Sigma F7250)
· Dimethyl
Sulfoxide (Sigma D2650)
·
Tris-HCl, 1
M Stock Solution, pH 8.0 (Sigma T3038)
100
milligrams of FITC was dissolved in 4 mL of DMSO and left
overnight to ensure complete dissolution and equilibration
of the mixture. Mix 80 uL of the FITC mixture with 2000 mL
Tris-HCl, 0.1M, pH 8.0, buffer to get a final concentration
of 0.001 mg/mL FITC solution. This is the solution to be
dispensed during the assay.
The final
concentration to be used is a function of several factors,
the most important to consider are the following; the
readable linear range of the plate reader, the strength of
the fluorescence, and the volume dispensed into the wells.
A standard curve was generated using a 12-channel pipette to
determine the ideal concentrations and volume of FITC to be
used, hence the concentrations used here reflects the
equipment and reagents used here.
The
manifolds were set up according the manufacture’s technote.
The FITC solution was dispensed into the microplates using
the VP 177AD-1 at dispense volumes of 50, 100, and 200 uL,
and volumes of 25, 50, and 75 using the VP 179BJD. These
transfers were done below the meniscus such that the liquid
would wick off any remaining drops on stainless steel tubes
(contact dispense). Another dispense technique was examined
with the VP 179BJD where the stainless steel tubes remained
above the wells when dispensing (non-contact), at dispense
volumes of 25, 50 and 75 uL. These conditions were tested
in triplicates (replicates of three).
Results

Table 1
represents the data obtained from the VP 177AD-1 and VP
179BJD. It includes the CVs for each individual replicate
as well as the average CV for the triplicate. Average CVs
were 3.40%, 4.23%, and 6.40% for the 200, 100, and 50 uL
transfers respectively using the VP 177AD-1. Average CVs
for the VP 179BJD were 3.87%, 4.16%, and 4.18% for the 75,
50, and 25 uL transfers respectively. Non-contact dispenses
using the VP 179BJD resulted in CVs of 6.67%, 7.46%, and
8.43% for dispense volumes of 75, 50, and 25 uL
respectively.
Discussion
When using
a common laboratory pipettor, oftentimes a droplet on the
pipette is left behind and must be wiped off, thus a
technician’s technique is imperative when attempting to
achieve acceptable CVs. The same effect occurs in pipetting
workstations as well, hence most of these workstations
include a “blowout” step using air to dislodge any hanging
droplets.
When using
V&P Scientific’s manifolds for non-contact dispensing, some
droplets are left hanging while others fall into the wells.
This seemingly random event from tube to tube results in
higher CVs, compared to the contact dispensing
(approximately a twofold increase). These increases in CVs
can be explained by the wicking effect attributed to contact
dispensing but absent in non-contact dispensing.
As the
volume dispensed decreased, CVs increased, a pattern
observed for all different types of transfers. This effect
was expected as with all instruments of this nature; as
desired volume dispense reduces, it becomes more difficult
to maintain low CVs. However, the VP 177AD-1 and VP 179BJD
were capable of maintaining acceptable (below 10%) CVs for
transfers as low as 50 and 25 uL per well respectively.
Conclusion
The
microplate is essential to high throughput screening, hence
many companies are dedicated to the development of
instrumentations for dispensing into microplates. The
“low-tech” end of the spectrum includes the multi-channel
pipettors, which can reliably fill microplates, but can be
time consuming and requires an experienced technician. The
“high-tech” instruments such as the pipetting workstations
can also reliably fill microplates, however, these devices
are very expensive, oftentimes out of the budget of small
labs. Even large labs will find that their workstations are
often better utilized for assays rather than filling plates
with buffers.
The VP
177AD-1 and VP 179BJD manifolds are capable of rapid
dispensing into microplates. These instruments can
instantly fill a microplate with one dispense, while
maintaining the precision of standard multi-channel
pipettors. This makes the VP 177AD-1 and VP 179BJD an
efficient and convenient alternative to regular pipetting,
or an economical replacement for expensive workstations.
References
- W.C. Sun, K.R. Gee, D.H. Klaubert,
R.P. Haugland. (1997) Synthesis of Fluorinated
Fluoresceins. Journal of Organic Chemistry, 62, (19),
pp. 6469-6475.
- G.F. Reed, F. Lynn, and B.D.
Meade. (2002) Use of Coefficient of Variation in
Assessing Variability of Quantitative Assays. Clinical
and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, Volume 9, No. 6,
pp. 1235-1239.
|